crit went much better than i had expecting considering the problems i had printing the work. i had planned to print earlier but i fell behind on my work schedule and ended up having to try and print that morning where most of it went wrong.
the results of the crit have very few changes to the over all design, some issues on 1st floor balcony and 2nd floor seminar space. as well as in showing the joints. long section needs a lot of work.
AD3.2
From: Morant, Steven (S.Morant@leedsmet.ac.uk)
You may not know this sender.Mark as safe|Mark as junk
Sent: 14 May 2010 12:47:20
To: jim_judge@hotmail.co.uk; j.judge6493@student.leedsmet.ac.uk
Dear James,
Following the review of your work yesterday, I think that I was wrong and that you may need the vertical elements to form a grid of triangles in the framing of the superstructure. By now, you have more photographs of precedent buildings than I have. Please do what you can to strengthen the design. The short section which shows the vertical wall becoming organic looks very weak and Robert Evans was clearly worried about several aspects of the long section. Please come in if you want to discuss matters.
Yours sincerely,
Steven Morant.
