Semester 2 week 9

Tuesday lecture Regan : The architects office.








This weeks Crit:


Result really is that everything needs redoing
-the layout doesn't work at all.
-exterior geometry doesnt work
- not drawing the existing site accurately nor the surrounding building facades.
Todo:
-redo layout to fill layout along briggate, Decide on some measure of geometry for the exterior. Draw accurately the existing facades on briggate. redraw the siteplan.






discovered images:




Conversation about an impossible library led to finding these images.

Semester 2 week 8

Tuesday Lecture: John Regan 'Planning Permission and building regs in practice.'





a lot of time this week was invested in the research for the technology submission,
however i did spend many hours experimenting with variable geometry in 3dsmax.

discovered this:

Semester 2 week 7

Simon Warren lecture: example of design and access statement.
Projection systems


Design work: invested many hours in learning and experimenting with 3dmax so not as much usable work as i'd hoped for.


discovered as part of design research.

http://www.absolutehollywood.com/

VR room
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/05/060510092605.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cave_Automatic_Virtual_Environment

not quite on topic: multitouchbarcelona

Semester 2 week 6

lectures: Procedures for planning and building regs.





Crit: Didnt not go well, which is unsurprising considering the little amount of design work i had. like most others i had invested more time in the research for tech work.
All i presented was my initial experiments in 3dsmax, so precedent and a few sketched images. Not really enough. Need to balance the tech work and design work.








EMAIL:

AT3.2 Submission 04/03/10‏
From: x-streammail@leedsmet.ac.uk
This message may be dangerous. Learn more
Sent: 02 March 2010 16:23:41
To: j.judge6493@student.leedsmet.ac.uk
From: Rebecca Burland[1406 - 200910]
To: All Students
CC:
Subject: AT3.2 Submission 04/03/10
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2010
Dear students

See below message from Keith Andrews:

In the preparation of your AT3.2 part one submissions could you ensure that not only is the basic research undertaken and documented, (to address the issues in the brief pertaining to , geology, evolution of synergy, solar, wind load, and water), but could you interpret it , outlining it’s significance in informing your design approach.

Regards

Keith Andrews