Crit: Didnt not go well, which is unsurprising considering the little amount of design work i had. like most others i had invested more time in the research for tech work.
All i presented was my initial experiments in 3dsmax, so precedent and a few sketched images. Not really enough. Need to balance the tech work and design work.
EMAIL:
AT3.2 Submission 04/03/10
From: x-streammail@leedsmet.ac.uk
This message may be dangerous. Learn more
Sent: 02 March 2010 16:23:41
To: j.judge6493@student.leedsmet.ac.uk
From: Rebecca Burland[1406 - 200910]
To: All Students
CC:
Subject: AT3.2 Submission 04/03/10
Sent: Tuesday, 2 March 2010
Dear students
See below message from Keith Andrews:
In the preparation of your AT3.2 part one submissions could you ensure that not only is the basic research undertaken and documented, (to address the issues in the brief pertaining to , geology, evolution of synergy, solar, wind load, and water), but could you interpret it , outlining it’s significance in informing your design approach.
Regards
Keith Andrews
